Correlation doesn’t imply Causation: A Real World Example


On the first day of our GCPP Workshop in Delhi, Pranay had asked us blog on a real world example of correlation which doesn’t imply causation also known as the Oldest Mistake in Public Policy (OMPP). The easiest and the most widely debated topic in this context is the whole argument on economic growth versus government debt.
Economic growth and government debt are correlated as the increase in rate of growth would generate higher revenues for the government which in turn could be used to reduce the debt burden. It can also be argued the other way round as well i.e. increase in government debt leads to lower economic growth but this is not entirely true.
In 2010, American Economists Carmen Reinhart and Kenneth Rogoff published a paper titled “Growth in a Time of Debt” in an issue of the American Economic Review. [1] The paper contends that when gross debt of a country is 60% of its GDP its growth rates falls by 2% and in those countries where gross debt is 90% of its GDP the economic growth is roughly cut by half. This paper was being cited as a justification for austerity programs in European countries with high levels of government debt.
In 2013, a paper in the Cambridge Journal of Economics criticized the assertion of Reinhert and Rogoff citing flawed methodology as there were coding errors in the statistical analysis and selective omission of data. [2]
This critique was endorsed by Nobel Prize winning Princeton Economists Paul Krugman who wrote in his New York Times Op-ed:
Economic research, austerity advocates insisted, showed that terrible things happen once debt exceeds 90 percent of G.D.P. But “economic research” showed no such thing; a couple of economists made that assertion, while many others disagreed. Policy makers abandoned the unemployed and turned to austerity because they wanted to, not because they had to.[3]
Paul Krugman further blogged providing data of G7 countries from 1950 to 2007, asserting that Britain didn’t suffer much from the high debt levels in the 1950s whereas Italy and Japan did. For Italy and more so with Japan it was slowing down of the economy that increased government debt and not the other way around. [4]
References
[1] Carmen M Reinhart, Kenneth S Rogoff (2010). "Growth in a Time of Debt". American Economic Review. 100 (2): 573–78. Link: https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/aer.100.2.573
[2] Thomas Herndon, Michael Ash, Robert Pollin. (2014). "Does High Public Debt Consistently Stifle Economic Growth? A Critique of Reinhart and Rogoff". Cambridge Journal of Economics. 38 (2): 257–279. Link: https://academic.oup.com/cje/article-abstract/38/2/257/1714018/Does-high-public-debt-consistently-stifle-economic?redirectedFrom=fulltext
[3] Paul Krugman The Excel Depression. The New York Times. April 18, 2013
[4] Paul Krugman Reinhart-Rogoff, Continued, The Conscience of a Liberal. April 16, 2013.






Comments